Table 1 Comparison of radiographic findings between different groups
Radiographic Findings | Positive (n = 4) | Negative (n = 4) | BC (n = 8) | i-PRF (n = 8) | HA (n = 8) | P-ECM (n = 8) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Intracanal hard tissue detected | No | 4 (100%) | 4 (100%) | 1 (12.5%) | 1 (12.5%) | 8 (100%) | 7 (87.5%) |
Yes | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 7 (87.5%) | 7 (87.5%) | 0 (0%) | 1 (12.5%) | |
P value | < 0.0001* | ||||||
Post hoc test | BC vs. HA = 0.005*, BC vs. P-ECM = 0.033*, i-PRF vs. HA = 0.005*, i-PRF vs. P-ECM = 0.033* | ||||||
Periapical radiolucency | No | 4 (100%) | 0 (0%) | 2 (25%) | 1 (12.5%) | 6 (75%) | 7 (87.5%) |
Yes | 0 (0%) | 4 (100%) | 6 (75%) | 7 (87.5%) | 2 (25%) | 1 (12.5%) | |
P value | 0.001* | ||||||
Post hoc test | i-PRF vs. P-ECM = 0.046* | ||||||
Root Resorption | No | 4 (100%) | 0 (0%) | 5 (62.5%) | 3 (37.5%) | 7 (87.5%) | 7 (87.5%) |
Yes | 0 (0%) | 4 (100%) | 3 (37.5%) | 5 (62.5%) | 1 (12.5%) | 1 (12.5%) | |
P value | 0.007* | ||||||
Post hoc test | Negative vs. HA = 0.046*, Negative vs. P-ECM = 0.046* | ||||||