Table 2 Comparison of the time required per registration method
From: Automated orofacial virtual patient creation using two cohorts of MSCT vs. CBCT scans
Registration methods | MSCT | CBCT | P value MSCT vs. CBCT | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Registration time (s) | Total time (s) | Registration time (s) | Total time (s) | Registration time (s) | Total time (s) | |
AI-driven | 24.9 ± 6.3 | 24.9 ± 6.3 | 28.5 ± 4.6 | 28.5 ± 4.6 | 0.513 | 0.513 |
AI-refined | 24.9 ± 6.3 | 24.9 ± 6.3 | 28.5 ± 4.6 | 28.5 ± 4.6 | 0.513 | 0.513 |
Average SAR | 242.3 ± 33.5 | 313.7 ± 32.3 | 275.7 ± 60.3 | 850.3 ± 174.0 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 |
SAR Observer 2 | 232.7 ± 30.1 | 292.2 ± 36.3 | 242.8 ± 101.8 | 635.3 ± 134.7 | ||
SAR Observer 1 | 251.9 ± 55.8 | 335.2 ± 53.1 | 308.5 ± 53.9 | 1065.3 ± 407.6 | ||
P value | P value | P value | P value | |||
AI-driven vs. SAR | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | ||
AI-refined vs. SAR | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | ||
AI-driven vs. AI-refined | > 0.999 | > 0.999 | > 0.999 | > 0.999 | ||
Observer 1 vs. Observer 2 | 0.334 | 0.063 | 0.090 | 0.023 | ||